Comments on: The Press Responds to the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize Decision http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/ Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:12:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: Curtis http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38693 Curtis Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:57:24 +0000 http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38693 Honestly, I am entirely ignorant of the situation between Al-Jazeera and the Qatari government. It's certainly something I'm interested in learning about. I didn't mean to come across as overly critical of their coverage---I actually thought it was pretty circumspect, and I considered the questions raised in that article (which wasn't the main one on the topic) to be intelligent, if perhaps misguided, as you note, QB. Thanks for your comments, guys! Honestly, I am entirely ignorant of the situation between Al-Jazeera and the Qatari government. It’s certainly something I’m interested in learning about. I didn’t mean to come across as overly critical of their coverage—I actually thought it was pretty circumspect, and I considered the questions raised in that article (which wasn’t the main one on the topic) to be intelligent, if perhaps misguided, as you note, QB.

Thanks for your comments, guys!

]]> By: QB http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38646 QB Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:37:03 +0000 http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38646 No RainCoaster not Arab. No RainCoaster not Arab.

]]> By: raincoaster http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38546 raincoaster Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:36:55 +0000 http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38546 Actually, Al Jazeera is an international news organization, and a pretty good one. Look at their reporting of this event: evenhanded and with an entirely original take on things. It's Qatar that's censoring them; freedom of speech is not a right in Qatar. Silencing them is not exactly the act of a supporter of free speech: are you Qatari, by any chance, QB? Actually, Al Jazeera is an international news organization, and a pretty good one. Look at their reporting of this event: evenhanded and with an entirely original take on things.

It’s Qatar that’s censoring them; freedom of speech is not a right in Qatar. Silencing them is not exactly the act of a supporter of free speech: are you Qatari, by any chance, QB?

]]> By: QB http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38442 QB Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:04:14 +0000 http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38442 Sorry for spamming your comments. Al Jazeera has no right to comment on peace. Al Jazeera is Qatar based TV station which provided all the resources to facilitate US invasion of Iraq, don't they have any shame for talking about peace and criticizing Nobel Peace Prize. Also Al Jazeera never will publish any criticism against their government or any criticism of the wrong religious laws. STFU is the correct advice for Al Jazeera. Sorry for spamming your comments. Al Jazeera has no right to comment on peace. Al Jazeera is Qatar based TV station which provided all the resources to facilitate US invasion of Iraq, don’t they have any shame for talking about peace and criticizing Nobel Peace Prize. Also Al Jazeera never will publish any criticism against their government or any criticism of the wrong religious laws. STFU is the correct advice for Al Jazeera.

]]> By: QB http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38441 QB Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:42:44 +0000 http://cantseetheforest.org/2007/10/16/the-press-responds-to-the-2007-nobel-peace-prize-decision/#comment-38441 Curtis, Did not read all of these article quotes because I was very interested in reading what Fox News had to say. Fox comments are what I expected. Curtis,

Did not read all of these article quotes because I was very interested in reading what Fox News had to say. Fox comments are what I expected.

]]>